COECSA, Journal, Ophthalmology
Reliability of clinical signs in diagnosis of fungal keratitis
Download PDF Article

Categories

How to Cite

Dr. Abel Ebong, D. A. (2024). Reliability of clinical signs in diagnosis of fungal keratitis. The Journal of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa, 15(01). Retrieved from https://joecsa.coecsa.org/index.php/joecsa/article/view/318

Abstract

Objective: To determine clinical signs predictive of fungal Keratitis (MK) in Uganda.

Methods: We prospectively recruited patients presenting with MK at two main eye units in Southern Uganda
between December 2016 and March 2018. We collected information on clinical history and presentation and
microbiology. Clinical signs predictive of a positive microbiological diagnosis of fungal keratitis were analyzed in
a multi variable logistic regression model.

Results: Three hundred and thirteen individuals were enrolled. Median age was 47 years (range 18-96 years)
and 174 (56%) were male. Trauma was reported by 29% and use of traditional eye medicine by 60%. Majority
presented with severe infections (median infiltrate size 5.2 mm); 47% were blind in the affected eye (vision <3/60).
Microbiology results were available in 265/313 (84.7%) participants. Overall, most infections were fungal (49%),
10% were bacterial and 4% were mixed (fungal and bacterial). Ninety-seven (37%) of the corneal scrapping
samples were negative on both microscopy and culture. Presence of a slough (aOR 3.58, 95% CI [1.60-8.04],
p=0.002), a serrated infiltrate margin (aOR 1.58, 95% CI [1.00-2.51], p=0.051), satellite lesions (aOR 2.90, 95% CI
[1.65-5.11], p<0.0001) and a hypopyon (aOR 3.24, 95% CI [1.78-5.90], p<0.0001) were associated with a positive
microbiology result for fungal keratitis.


Conclusion: This study conducted in a predominantly African population provided clues to support clinicians in
making a diagnosis of fungal keratitis in settings where there is no microbiology support.

Download PDF Article

References

Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Mandell, Douglas,

and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious

Diseases E-Book. Elsevier health sciences; 2019.

Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M. Corneal ulceration

in the developing world—a silent epidemic. Br J

Ophthalmol.. 1997; 81(8):622-623.

Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal

blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health

Organ. 2001; 79(3):214-221.

Arunga S, Kintoki GM, Mwesigye J, et al.

Epidemiology of microbial keratitis in Uganda:

a cohort study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020;

(2):121-131.

Titiyal JS, Negi S, Anand A, Tandon R, Sharma N,

Vajpayee RB. Risk factors for perforation in microbial

corneal ulcers in north India. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;

(6):686-689.

Pharmakakis NM, Andrikopoulos GK, Papadopoulos

GE, Petropoulos IK, Kolonitsiou FI, Koliopoulos JX.

Does identification of the causal organism of corneal

ulcers influence the outcome? Eur J Ophthalmol.

; 13(1):11-17.

Burton MJ, Pithuwa J, Okello E, et al. Microbial

keratitis in East Africa: why are the outcomes so

poor? Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011; 18(4):158-163.

Leck AK, Thomas PA, Hagan M, et al. Aetiology

of suppurative corneal ulcers in Ghana and south

India, and epidemiology of fungal keratitis. Br J

Ophthalmol. 2002; 86(11):1211-15.

Dalmon C, Porco TC, Lietman TM, et al. The clinical

differentiation of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a

photographic survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.

; 53(4):1787-91.

Leck A, Burton M. Distinguishing fungal and

bacterial keratitis on clinical signs. Comm Eye

Health/Intern Centre Eye Health. 2015; 28(89):6-7.

Chidambaram JD, Venkatesh Prajna N, Srikanthi

P, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical

outcomes in severe microbial keratitis in South India.

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018; 25(4):297-305.

Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, et al. The

mycotic ulcer treatment trial: a randomized trial

comparing natamycin vs voriconazole. JAMA

Ophthalmol. 2013; 131(4):422-429.

Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IAT, et al.

Development and validation of a smartphone-based

visual acuity test (peek acuity) for clinical practice

and community-based fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol.

; 133(8):930-937.

Arunga S, Kintoki GM, Mwesigye J, et al.

Epidemiology of microbial keratitis in Uganda: A

cohort study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020; 27(2):121-

doi:10.1080/09286586.2019.1700533

Hagan M, Wright E, Newman M, Dolin P, Johnson

G. Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana. Br J

Ophthalmol. 1995; 79(11):1024-28.

Hageage GJ, Harrington BJ. Use of calcofluor white

in clinical mycology. Lab Med. 1984; 15(2):109-112.

Jofré E, Liaudat JP, Medeot D, Becker A. Monitoring

succinoglycan production in single sinorhizobium

meliloti cells by calcofluor white M2R staining and

time-lapse microscopy. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;

:918-922.

Chidambaram JD, Venkatesh Prajna N, Srikanthi

P, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical

outcomes in severe microbial keratitis in South India.

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018; 25(4):297-305.

Hoffman JJ, Yadav R, Sanyam S das, et al. Microbial

keratitis in Nepal: predicting the microbial aetiology

from clinical features. J Fungi. 2022; 8(2):201.

Thomas PA, Leck AK, Myatt M. Characteristic

clinical features as an aid to the diagnosis of

suppurative keratitis caused by filamentous fungi. Br

J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(12):1554-58.

Dalmon C, Porco TC, Lietman TM, et al. The clinical

differentiation of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a

photographic survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.

; 53(4):1787-91.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.