COECSA, Journal, Ophthalmology
Sensitivity and specificity of McMonnies Questionnaire in diagnosing dry eye syndrome among patients aged 40 years and above in Uganda
Download PDF Article

Keywords

Dry eye syndrome
Sensitivity and specificity
McMonnies Questionnaire
Uganda

Categories

How to Cite

Atto G, Twinamasiko A, Arunga S. (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of McMonnies Questionnaire in diagnosing dry eye syndrome among patients aged 40 years and above in Uganda. The Journal of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa, 15(01). Retrieved from https://joecsa.coecsa.org/index.php/joecsa/article/view/315

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of McMonnies Questionnaire (MQ) as a screening tool for
Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) among patients aged 40 years and above attending Ruharo Eye Centre (REC).

Design: This was a cross-sectional hospital-based study.

Methods: The study was conducted during the months of September to December 2017. Both males (76) and
females (91) who were aged 40 years and above using convenient sampling were included. All participants were
screened for DES using McMonnies Questionnaire after which assessment for the signs of DES using Schirmer
I, TBUT and Rose Bengal tests were done. We entered data into Excel and exported into Stata 13.0 for analysis.

Results: A total of 167 patients were enrolled, 91 (54.49%) were females. The female to male ratio was 1.2:1. The
median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 54-72, range: 40-94). The median Schirmer I, TBUT and MQ scores
were 14 mm (IQR: 5-22, range: 1-35), 6.67 seconds (IQR: 3.33-17, range: 1-34.33) and 12 (IQR: 9-17 range of 2-27).
The prevalence of DES was 68%. The sensitivity and specificity of McMonnies Questionnaire in diagnosing DES
were 81.6% (95% CI, 73.2 - 88.2) and 39.6% (95% CI, 26.5 - 54) respectively.

Conclusion: The McMonnies Questionnaire had a high sensitivity (81.3%)but low specificity (36.9%) in diagnosing
DES. Therefore, when such a test is negative, it is good for ruling out DES but not suitable for identifying
people at risk of the disease.

Download PDF Article

References

Torricelli AAM, Novaes P, Matsuda M, Alves MR,

Monteiro MLR. 2007 Report of the Internationl Dry

Eye Workshop (DEWS). Vol 74.; 2011. doi:10.1590/

S0004-27492011000500016.

Sahai A, Malik P. Dry eye: Prevalence and attributable

risk factors in a hospital-based population. Indian J

Ophthalmol. 2005;53(2):87-91. doi:10.4103/0301-

16170.

C Stephen Foster, MD, FACS, FACR, FAAO F. Dry

Eye Disease (Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca) Clinical

presentation: History. Accessed January 10, 2021.

https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1210417-

clinical.

Lee AJ, Lee J, Saw SM, et al. Prevalence and

risk factors associated with dry eye symptoms:

A population based study in Indonesia. Br J

Ophthalmol. 2002;86(12):1347-51. doi:10.1136/

bjo.86.12.1347.

Nichols K, Weibel K. The epidemiology of dry

eye disease. Ocul Surf Disord. 2013;5(2):27-27.

doi:10.5005/jp/books/12072_4.

Erickson PM, Stapleton F, Giannakopoulos DE.

Reliability of the McMonnies Dry Eye Questionnaire.

Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(13):3068.

Buderer NM. Statistical methodology: I.

Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the

sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.

Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(9):895-900.

Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL. The reliability

and validity of mcmonnies dry eye index. Cornea.

;23(4):365-371. doi:10.1097/00003226-

-00010.

Charles W. McMonnies AH. Patient history in

screening for dry eye conditions. J AM Optom Assoc.

;58(4):296-301.

Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G,

Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity

of the ocular surface disease index. Arch

Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615-621. doi:10.1001/

archopht.118.5.615.

Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal

and conjunctival staining in the context of other

dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640-650.

doi:10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008.

Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Chalmers R,

Begley C. The performance of the contact lens dry

eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact

lens-related dry eye. Cornea. 2002;21(5):469-475.

doi:10.1097/00003226-200207000-00007

McMonnies C, Ho A, Wakefield D. Optimum

classification of dry eye using questionnaire

responses. J Am Optom Assoc. 1998;117(2):835-837.

Hay EM, Thomas E, Pal B, Hajeer A, Chambers H,

Silman AJ. Weak association between subjective

symptoms of and objective testing for dry eyes and

dry mouth: Results from a population based study.

Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(1):20-24. doi:10.1136/

ard.57.1.20.

Schein OD, Munuz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K,

West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am

J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):723-728. doi:10.1016/

S0002-9394(14)71688-5.

Liu NN, Liu L, Li J, Sun YZ. Prevalence of and risk

factors for dry eye symptom in mainland China: A

systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol.

;2014. doi:10.1155/2014/748654.

Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BEK. Long-term

incidence of dry eye in an older population.

Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(8):668-674. doi:10.1097/

OPX.0b013e318181a947.

Fuentes-Páez G, Herreras JM, Cordero Y, Almaraz

A, González MJ, Calonge M. Lack of concordance

between dry eye syndrome questionnaires and

diagnostic tests. Arch la Soc Española Oftalmol

(English Ed. 2011;86(1):3-7. doi:10.1016/s2173-

(11)70002-0.

Bjerrum KB. Test and symptoms in keratoconjunctivitis

sicca and their correlation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.

;74(5):436-441. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.

tb00595.x.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.