COECSA, Journal, Ophthalmology
Central corneal thickness and its relationship with IOP, visual fields and optic disc parameters among glaucoma patients attending the Eye Hospital at University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia
Download PDF Article


Central Corneal Thickness (CCT)
Cup Disc Ratio (CDR)
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
Visual Field (VF)
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

How to Cite

Muma MKI, Nyalazi JIM, Mumba T, Zulu G, Syakantu G, Chinama – Musonda LM, Bailey R, Simulundu E, Michelo C. (2023). Central corneal thickness and its relationship with IOP, visual fields and optic disc parameters among glaucoma patients attending the Eye Hospital at University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. The Journal of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa, 15(01). Retrieved from


Background: Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of optic neuropathies characterized by an acquired loss
of retinal ganglion cells, optic nerve atrophy and Visual Field Defects (VFD). Raised Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
is the only causal risk factor for glaucoma that can be therapeutically and surgically manipulated to change
the course of the disease process. Though Goldman Applanation Tonometry (GAT) is the “gold standard”
for IOP measurement, readings of IOP with GAT are believed to be influenced by Central Corneal Thickness
(CCT). The study evaluated the correlation of CCT and IOP with VFD parameters like Mean Deviation (MD),
Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) and Cup-to-Disc Ratio (CDR) in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)

To determine the relationship of central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, visual fields and
optic disc parameters in Zambian primary open angle glaucoma patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2014 from January to September and all glaucoma
patients visiting the University Teaching Hospitals – Eye Hospital during the study period were included
if they consented to it and met the inclusion criteria. A total of 166 randomly selected newly diagnosed
glaucoma patients aged 18 years and above were recruited. The CCT was measured using Kacon Ophthalmic
Ultrasound system and IOP was measured by GAT. Analyses were carried out considering the level of
significance at 5%.

One hundred and sixty-six newly diagnosed glaucoma patients aged 18 to 88 years were included
into the study. There were 85 (51.2%) males and 81 (48.8%) females with a mean age being 51.31 years. The
mean IOP was 23.60 (±10.40) mmHg. The mean CCT was 531.9 (±40.59). All the participants had primary
open angle glaucoma POAG. Thin CCT was significantly correlated with vertical CDR (r= - 0.023, and 0.011).
Thin CCT was also significantly associated with worsened MD of visual field (r= - 0.033 and p=0.023) and PSD
(r= - 0.027 and p=0.012).

Conclusions: The mean CCT of Zambian POAG patients is thinner as compared to other races. CCT was
positively correlated with IOP. Patients who had thicker CCT were more likely to have low IOP compared to
patients who had thinner CCT. In the POAG patients thinner CCT was associated with greater cup disc ratio
and Visual Field (VF) damages than those with a thicker CCT.

Download PDF Article


Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people

with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J

Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:262–267.

National Eye Health Strategic Plan, 2017 – 2021,

Ministry of Health, 2017, Zambia.

Muma MKI, Bailey R, Michelo C. Primary open

angle glaucoma as seen at the University Teaching

Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. J Ophthalmol East

Centr South Afr. 2018; 22(2): 45-47.

Gelaw Y, Kollmann M, Irunga NM, Ilako DR.

The influence of central corneal thickness on

intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann

applanation tonometry among selected Ethiopian

communities. J Glaucoma. 2010; 19:514–518.

Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL, Tsai JC.

Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in

the management of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol.

; 122:1270–1275.

Thomas R, Korah S, Muliyil J. The role of central

corneal thickness in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000; 48:107–111.

Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect

of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry.

Am J Ophthalmol. 1993; 115:592–596.

Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pürsten A,

Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal

thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on

applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;


Zhang H, Xu L, Chen C, Jonas JB. Central corneal

thickness in adult Chinese: Associations with

ocular and general parameters. The Beijing eye

study. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;


Nangia V, Jonas JB, Sinha A, Matin A, Kulkarni

M. Central corneal thickness and its association

with ocular and general parameters in Indians:

The central India eye and medical study.

Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:705–710.

Hahn S, Azen S, Ying-Lai M, Varma R. Central

corneal thickness in Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol

Vis Sci. 2003; 44:1508–1512.

Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure

measurement—comparison of dynamic contour

tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

J Glaucoma. 2006; 15:2–6.

Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry

[article in German]. Ophthalmologica. 1957;


Cockburn DM. Tonometry. In: Eskridge JB, Amos

JF, Bartlett JD, editors. Clinical procedures in

optometry. New York: J P Lippincott Company,

; p. 221–237.

Ehlers N. On corneal thickness and intraocular

pressure. II. A clinical study on the thickness of

the central stroma in glaucomatous eyes. Acta

Ophthalmol. 1970; 48:1107–1112.

Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation

tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta

Ophthalmol. 1975; 53:34–43.

Eballe AO, Koki G, Ellong A, et al. Central

corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the

Cameroonian nonglaucomatous population. Clin

Ophthalmol. 2010; 4:717–724.

Ntim-Amponsah CT, Seidu AY, Essuman VA,

et al. A study of central corneal thickness in

glaucoma and nonglaucoma patients in a West

African population. Cornea. 2012; 31:1093–1096.

Pillunat LE, Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Puersten A,

Spoerl E. Effect of corneal thickness, curvature and

axial length on Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44:4237.

Mercieca K, Odogu V, Feibai B, Arowolo O,

Chukwuka F. Comparing central corneal thickness

in a sub-Saharan cohort to African Americans and

Afro-Caribbeans. Cornea. 2007; 26:557–560.

Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai M, et al. Effects of corneal

thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular

pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry

and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology.

; 114:20–26.

Brandt JD. Corneal thickness in glaucoma

screening, diagnosis, and management. Curr Opin

Ophthalmol. 2004; 15:85–89.

Dueker DK, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Corneal

thickness measurement in the management

of primary open-angle glaucoma: A report by

the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1779–1787.

Kaushik S, Gyatsho J, Jain R, Pandav SS, Gupta

A. Correlation between retinal nerve fiber layer

thickness and central corneal thickness in patients

with ocular hypertension: An optical coherence

tomography study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;


Moghimi S, Torabi H, Hashemian H, Amini H,

Lin S. Central corneal thickness in primary angle

closure and open angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmic

Vis Res. 2014; 9:439–443.


Download data is not yet available.